Ad Spend Allocator — decide where the next dollar should go — Claude Skill
Claude Code용 Claude 스킬 · 제공: Gooseworks · 실행: /ad-spend-allocator (Claude 내)·업데이트: 2026년 4월 10일
Reallocate ad budget across paid channels by efficiency
- Normalizes performance data across Google, Meta, LinkedIn, and other channels
- Computes funnel-adjusted CAC, not just CPA
- Detects over- and under-invested channels with efficiency index
- Models conservative, aggressive, and budget-increase scenarios
- Outputs week-by-week implementation plan
대상
기능
Decide how to split next quarter's paid budget across channels based on actual results, not gut feel.
Find out when a channel has hit diminishing returns and needs budget shifted elsewhere.
Get a recommended test budget and success criteria for a channel you haven't tried yet.
작동 방식
Take per-channel spend, conversion, and funnel data as input
Normalize all channels to apples-to-apples metrics
Compute efficiency index per channel
Model 3 scenarios: conservative, aggressive, and budget increase
Output reallocation table with implementation plan
개선되는 지표
지원 도구
Ad Spend Allocator을(를) 사용해 보시겠어요?
시작 방법을 선택하세요.
이 스킬을 컴퓨터에 로컬로 설치하고 실행합니다.
컴퓨터에서 터미널을 열고 이 명령을 붙여넣으세요:
이 명령은 스킬과 모든 파일을 컴퓨터에 다운로드합니다:
모든 프로젝트에서 사용하려면 끝에 -g를 추가하세요.
Claude Code를 시작한 다음 명령을 입력하세요:
Ad Spend Allocator
Take performance data from multiple ad channels and figure out where your next dollar should go. This skill compares channels on equal terms, identifies where you're over-spending vs under-spending relative to results, and produces a concrete budget reallocation plan.
Core principle: Most startups either spread budget too thin across channels (no channel gets enough to learn) or dump everything into one channel (missing cheaper opportunities elsewhere). This skill finds the right distribution.
When to Use
- "How should I split my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend across channels"
- "Where am I getting the best return?"
- "I have $X/month for ads — how should I distribute it?"
Phase 0: Intake
- Total monthly ad budget — Current or planned
- Channels currently running — Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Twitter/X Ads, TikTok Ads, other
- Performance data per channel — For each active channel:
- Monthly spend
- Impressions
- Clicks / CTR
- Conversions (and conversion type: demo, trial, purchase)
- CPA or CAC
- Revenue attributed (if available)
- ROAS (if available)
- Primary conversion goal — Demos / Trials / Purchases / MQLs
- Funnel data (if available):
- Lead → MQL rate
- MQL → SQL rate
- SQL → Close rate
- Average deal size
- Channels you're considering but haven't tried — Want to test new channels?
- Constraints — Minimum spend on any channel? Platform you must stay on?
Phase 1: Channel Normalization
Apples-to-Apples Comparison
Normalize all channels to the same metrics:
| Channel | Monthly Spend | Impressions | Clicks | CTR | CPC | Conversions | Conv Rate | CPA | ROAS | CAC* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | [N] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [N] | [X%] | $[X] | [X] | $[X] |
| Google Display | ... | |||||||||
| Meta (FB/IG) | ... | |||||||||
| ... | ||||||||||
| [Other] | ... | |||||||||
| Total | $[X] | [N] | $[X] avg | [X] avg | $[X] avg |
*CAC = Full customer acquisition cost if funnel data provided (CPA × close-rate adjustment)
Funnel-Adjusted CAC (If Funnel Data Available)
Channel CAC = CPA ÷ (MQL rate × SQL rate × Close rate)
This reveals which channels produce leads that actually close, not just convert.
Phase 2: Channel Efficiency Analysis
2A: Efficiency Ranking
| Rank | Channel | CPA | Funnel-Adj CAC | Share of Spend | Share of Conversions | Efficiency Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Channel] | $[X] | $[X] | [X%] | [X%] | [Conv share ÷ Spend share] |
Efficiency Index:
- > 1.0 = Under-invested (getting more than its share of conversions)
- = 1.0 = Proportional (fair share)
- < 1.0 = Over-invested (getting less than its share)
2B: Marginal Return Analysis
For each channel, estimate if additional spend would yield proportional returns:
| Channel | Current CPA | Impression Share / Saturation Signal | Marginal Return Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | [X%] impression share — room to grow | Likely positive |
| Meta | $[X] | Frequency [X] — audience may be saturated | Diminishing |
| $[X] | Low volume — limited targeting pool | Ceiling soon |
2C: Funnel Stage Coverage
| Funnel Stage | Channels Covering It | Current Spend | Gap? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Awareness (top) | [Meta Display, YouTube] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Consideration (mid) | [Google Search, Meta retargeting] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Decision (bottom) | [Google Brand, Google Search] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
| Retargeting | [Meta, Google Display] | $[X] | [Yes/No] |
Phase 3: Reallocation Recommendations
3A: Budget Shift Table
| Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Reasoning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Google Search | $[X] | $[Y] | +$[Z] | [Lowest CPA, room to scale] |
| Meta | $[X] | $[Y] | -$[Z] | [Audience saturation, frequency too high] |
| $[X] | $[Y] | $0 | [Maintain — niche but valuable] | |
| [New channel] | $0 | $[Y] | +$[Y] | [Test budget — competitors succeeding here] |
| Total | $[X] | $[X] | $0 | Budget-neutral reallocation |
3B: Scenario Modeling
Scenario 1: Conservative shift (+/- 20%)
- Expected conversions: [N] (currently [N]) = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X] (currently $[X])
- Risk: Low
Scenario 2: Aggressive shift (+/- 40%)
- Expected conversions: [N] = [X%] improvement
- Expected blended CPA: $[X]
- Risk: Medium — less data on scaled channels
Scenario 3: Budget increase to $[Y]/mo
- Recommended allocation: [table]
- Expected conversions: [N]
- New channels to test: [list]
Phase 4: Output Format
# Ad Spend Allocation — [Product/Client] — [DATE]
Total monthly budget: $[X]
Active channels: [list]
Period analyzed: [date range]
---
## Current State
| Channel | Spend | % of Budget | Conversions | CPA | Efficiency |
|---------|-------|------------|-------------|-----|-----------|
| [Channel] | $[X] | [X%] | [N] | $[X] | [Over/Under/Fair] |
**Blended CPA:** $[X]
**Total conversions:** [N]
---
## Recommended Reallocation
| Channel | Current | Recommended | Change | Why |
|---------|---------|------------|--------|-----|
| [Channel] | $[X] | $[Y] | [+/-$Z] | [1-line reason] |
**Projected impact:**
- Conversions: [N] → [N] (+[X%])
- Blended CPA: $[X] → $[Y] (-[X%])
---
## Funnel Stage Coverage
[Coverage map with gaps identified]
---
## New Channel Recommendations
### [Channel Name]
- **Why test:** [Reasoning]
- **Recommended test budget:** $[X]/mo for [X weeks]
- **Success criteria:** CPA < $[X]
- **Competitors using it:** [Yes/No — who]
---
## Implementation Plan
### Week 1: Quick Shifts
- [ ] Reduce [Channel] from $[X] to $[Y]
- [ ] Increase [Channel] from $[X] to $[Y]
- [ ] Set up [New Channel] test campaign
### Week 2-4: Monitor
- [ ] Track CPA shifts on scaled channels
- [ ] Watch for diminishing returns signals
- [ ] Evaluate new channel performance
### Month 2: Re-evaluate
- [ ] Run this analysis again with new data
- [ ] Adjust allocations based on actual results
Save to clients/<client-name>/ads/spend-allocation-[YYYY-MM-DD].md.
Cost
| Component | Cost |
|---|---|
| Data analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Statistical modeling | Free |
| Total | Free |
Tools Required
- No external tools needed — pure reasoning skill
- User provides multi-channel performance data
Trigger Phrases
- "How should I allocate my ad budget?"
- "Should I spend more on Google or Meta?"
- "Reallocate my ad spend"
- "Where am I getting the best ROAS?"
- "Optimize my multi-channel ad budget"